Blog

Image: Statues

17/07/2020

Gilbert Márkus reflects on how to read a statue.  Weekly blog.


To be honest, I’ve been walking around ignoring statues all my life, the only time I ever paid attention to these monuments of civic ideology was when someone did something daft like plonking a traffic cone on its head or climbing up it naked.
 
 
In the last few weeks though, I have been forced to think about statues, largely thanks to the Black Lives Matter movement, which has recently drowned a statue of the slave-trader Edward Colston in the Bristol Docks, and which has brought down
various Confederate monuments in America.

But is there a specifically Catholic story to be told about statues and their place in the Western tradition.  What are they for?  What do they say?

In Ancient Rome and its neighbouring societies, the public statue was a statement of power.   The emperor or the god who rules and protects this city. Or the great general who overthrows our enemies. At a more modest scale, celebrating the power of ‘our troops’ overthrowing our enemies, like this carving of a Roman cavalryman at Bridgeness (West Lothian), trampling defeated and naked British warriors. Power and submission.
 
 
The public statue celebrated power.  And into this world comes Christianity with a different kind of statue.  A statue (or carving) turning the whole genre upside down.  It shows a powerless human body, a body subjected to judicial murder on a hill outside Jerusalem.  It first appears around AD 400, carved on the door of the ancient church of Santa Sabina - certainly one of the first representations of the Crucified Christ in the west.
 
 
It is not a large piece.   It doesn’t tower over the viewer, like the imperial statue on its plinth.  It meets you at eye level.  You can touch it.  And the figure is stripped of all power – and most of his clothes – inviting not submission or admiration, but perhaps compassion; inviting the viewer to see the presence of God in powerlessness. It turns the ‘Great Man’ sculptural tradition upside down.  The crucifix becomes the central and subversive idea in all our churches, and every Catholic home. 
 
Here’s my office wall at home, and I write under this ‘statue’ every day
 
 
Of course, people continue to make statues of powerful people that celebrate power.  The human temptation to admire power is one of the hardest to shake off, in spite of two thousand years of the preaching of the Gospel: ‘the greatest among you shall be the least’.   We still do it with our Confederate generals, Herbert Colstons, Viscount Dundas, towering over us on their plinths.  But perhaps unknowingly, the mobs that bring them down have inherited something of our Gospel tradition.

In the 1940s, Hungarian Nazis took thousands of Jews to the River Danube in Budapest, stole their possessions and shoes, and shot them, dropping their bodies into the river.  At that spot is a different kind of sculpture: a row of shoes cast in bronze, fixed to the ground.
The sculpture has become a shrine, revealing the bodies of the murdered men, women and children, but revealing them as absent, their shoes marking where they once stood.  People now come there to pray, lay flowers, remember.  Not a celebration of power but a celebration of humanity in the face of power. A celebration of solidarity and compassion.  It is in the same tradition as the crucifix that is the essential ‘statue’ which has guided the Catholic vision for so many generations.
 


Image: Listening - More than simply hearing.

10/07/2020

Robert Burnett of the Scottish Laity Network reflects on a journey taken during the pandemic to seek the Church’s future post COVID.  Weekly blog.


During the lockdown, the Core Group of the Scottish Laity Network began reflecting on The Future of the Church After a Time of Pandemic and how that related to our core vision of enabling Scottish laity to come together as disciples of Jesus, and through prayer, dialogue and discernment find ‘new ways’ of being Church in Scotland in the 21st Century.

We asked: how could we come together and pray, dialogue and discern new ways of being Church during the pandemic? Reflecting on Pope Francis’ leadership, we saw clearly the centrality of discernment in his life and in his papacy and that his hope is for a discerning Church that finds full expression as a synodal Church. In his address on the 50th Anniversary of the Institution of the Synod of Bishops, Pope Francis powerfully articulated this vision:

A synodal Church is a Church which listens, which realises that listening “is more than simply hearing”. It is a mutual listening in which everyone has something to learn. The faithful people, the college of bishops, the Bishop of Rome: all listening to each other, and all listening to the Holy Spirit, the “Spirit of truth”, in order to know what he “says to the Churches”.

So during lockdown, we reflected on how we could nurture the process of becoming a discerning Church and engage in a process of mutual listening and learning.

The initial fruit was to initiate an online Journey of Discernment. At the end of April we invited renowned Christian speakers to share their thoughts and reflections with us and to be part of this stage of our journey. We believe their positive response was an affirmation of the Spirit for our journey that began on Thursday 28th May.

We have had presentations from Fr Jim Martin, Massimo Faggioli, Austen Ivereigh, Mary McAleese and Lorna Gold. Our final session is with Jim Wallis.

Each speaker has shared insights into the ‘signs of the times’ and engaged fully in question and answer sessions. We are profoundly grateful to them.

Our journey reaches an important stage with our Assembly tomorrow, Saturday 11th July, when Fr Augusto Zampini will share the vision and hope of the Vatican’s COVID-19 Commission, and Mary Cullen will help root us in the ‘signs of the times’ in the Scottish Church. We will try to discern what the Spirit is saying to the Scottish Laity Network at this crucial time, not only for our nation, but our planet.

It was never the idea that our speakers would give us a definitive way forward: there was always the understanding for the participants in our journey to discern both individually and communally. We each need to discern where the promptings of the Spirit are calling us to act. As the late Dan Berrigan, America’s finest poet-prophet-priest said:

One cannot level one’s moral lance at every evil in the universe. There are just too many of them. But you can do something; and the difference between doing something and doing nothing is everything.

Each of us may discern a different call and we will look at ways that we can affirm people in their discernment and support them in their action.
 

 



Image: Bishop Nolan reflects how this week's vote at Westminster will affect migrants he met in Calais.

03/07/2020

Bishop William Nolan, Bishop President of Justice and Peace Scotland, reflects on a visit to Calais, and the effect this week’s parliamentary vote may have on migrants like those he met there.


It is a cold November morning. We come to a clearing in the woods and see the remains of a makeshift fire. We are in Calais and this is obviously a spot where migrants gather. There is no one there when we arrive but as we wait, one by one, young men appear.

Most of the group are Ethiopians, Christians. They welcome our visit, and welcome also the hot tea we bring with us. One or two are chatty, but most take their tea and sit on a wooden log and stare into the distance. The vacant look on their faces makes me wonder about their mental health. Their one hope is to get on a lorry and get into the UK. It is then, the aid workers tell us, once they reach their goal, that their mental health problems will come to the surface.

For these young men are traumatised: by the events in their homeland that caused them to flee; by the journey through Africa and across the Mediterranean; by the constant harassment in Calais, as they are woken in the night by the police and pepper sprayed, their tents and sleeping bags confiscated.

While they see the UK as the Promised Land, they will be sadly disappointed when they get there. They want to work, but they will not be allowed to work; they want to begin a new life, but that new life will be put on hold while their asylum claim is assessed. They risk being put in a detention centre, locked up for any length of time. The UK government don’t call them detention centres, they are called Immigration Removal Centres, and while in other European countries there is a limit on how long a person can be detained, there is no limit in the UK. A criminal guilty of murder knows how long they will be locked up, but not a migrant whose only crime is to seek asylum.

There was a hope that Parliament might put a legal limit on detention, but on Tuesday 332 Members of the Parliament thought otherwise, and that amendment failed.

And the fate of child migrants is not any better. At the moment the Dublin III Regulation means that child migrants in Europe who have family in the UK can come to the UK and stay with their family while their asylum request is considered. This is an EU agreement and so will lapse when the transition period ends in December. On Tuesday, 342 Members of Parliament voted against continuing to allow children that legal right to come here.

Pope Francis tells us that we should look in the eye the person in need and see a fellow human being. There are many in our country who do just that and show concern for migrants and refugees. But sadly the Westminster Parliament puts us to shame. Maybe one day we will live in a country where Parliament votes to respect the human dignity of those who seek our help – but not yet.




Page 23 of 89First   Previous   18  19  20  21  22  [23]  24  25  26  27  Next   Last