Blog

Image: Calais Red Calais White Calais Blue

06/12/2019

This week our blog is a reflection on the refugee and migrant situation in Calais by Alex Holmes.


Calais Red. Washed red trainers tucked into the rotting tree stump, red Berbere spice, red Harissa, the hot chili pepper paste in a large tub at the food distribution – ‘but too much,’ says Yonas, ‘is bad for the stomach’.
 
Gebre shows me his cracked phone screen. “The CRS* he hit me and broke the screen. He hit my friend too, in the face.” He points to his nose. “Blood, too much blood.”
 
A red candle burns, a red sanctuary light, signifier of God’s Presence.
 
The fumes of a makeshift heater killed a young Nigerian exile. His orange tent is now a small shrine, red sanctuary light burning, a dozen small candles flickering. His photo is set into a shallow wooden box. Nearly midnight, and among the dark shapes of small tents, dying fires, dripping black trees, there’s an intense, sad silence.
 
White on red - the No Entry sign near the stadium where Eritrean Orthodox Christians meet for prayer. A wooden cross, a rosary and a small icon of the Theotokos, Mary, the God-bearer, with the Child Jesus are bound to the signpost. A tarpaulin is laid on the cold tarmac, shoes are removed, heads bared, and the young men listen attentively to the Eritrean deacon’s words. As he speaks, a white minibus parks twenty metres away. A CRS officer winds down his window and films.
 
More white. The whites of eyes veined red from exhaustion. A white full moon. Breakfast before Sunday prayers. On the fire, steam rising from a white circle of milk. The Sunday sun bleaching white the two deacons’ prayer shawls.
 
Tall poplars shedding their late season blackened leaves cloak the small encampment where we meet. After weeks of persistent rain, a lake has formed close to the camp. The half dozen tents are raised on pallets. Woldu, in his perfect white shoes, balances on a section of pallet that acts as decking to his tented home.
 
“I clean my shoes every day,” he says.
 
We go to another Eritrean camp. Semere attempts to light a fire, but the wood is wet. By burning white plastic jerry cans and dousing the wood with cooking oil, the fire comes to life and Tesfay starts preparing a meal, but the acrid fumes of burning plastic sting the eyes.
 
The flames light up the blue tarpaulins that protect sagging tents from the rain. A discarded blue camping mat floats on the large puddle beside the tents. It’s cold and damp. Birhan wears blue flip-flops. The only shoes he has – no socks.
 
Aziz, on the other side of the fire, was badly beaten three nights previously.
 
“Four white guys got out of a car. They kicked and beat me and took my phone. I’m ok. But - there are good and bad people in Eritrea too.”
 
Beside me at the fire is Fessehaye. He locates Calais on Google maps then he moves the across the Channel. “Small, small distance,” he says. He then flits across the world to Eritrea, opens his photos and there he is, in a boat on an absurdly blue sea, smiling in the bright sunshine. Blue.
 
Red, white and blue.
 
Tesfay looks up from his cooking at the passing lorries, the only means these exiles have to cross the Channel and seek asylum in the UK.
 
“Getting to UK is too hard now. It’s Mission Impossible,” he says. Somehow he manages a smile.
 
*CRS: Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité (the French riot Police)


Image: Symbols – an exploration by Ross Ahlfeld

29/11/2019

This week in our blog, Ross Ahlfeld reflects on the symbols that are all around us and, in particular, the recent contraversy over the Pachamama at the Amazon synod.


Have you ever noticed all the ‘pagan idols’ around our oldest Scottish chapels in the Highlands and Islands? Sure, the locals call them ‘Celtic Crosses’ but we all know that they are in actual fact heathen ‘sun-wheel’ symbols, probably once used for some kind of pre-Christian worship.

If the idea of our old Gaelic parishes worshipping a solar deity sounds ridiculous, then that’s because it is.

And it is no more fanciful than the suggestion that a Pachamama fertility deity was being ‘worshiped’ by Catholics during the Amazon Synod in Rome. (Pachamamas are actually associated with the Inca people of the Andes rather than the Amazon region.)

Yet it seems that some were happy to accept this claim as reality, despite the fact that both indigenous Synod participants and Vatican officials stated that the carvings on display inside the Santa Maria were neither fertility goddesses nor objects of worship. 

The social media outrage from US conservatives hostile to Pope Francis has forced the Synod organisers to reiterate the fact that the carvings were merely symbolic of a place, a people, a culture and most importantly; a symbol of life. Indeed, some even refer to the images as Our Lady of the Amazon.

We have all seen that during the Synod, the carvings were taken from the Church and thrown in the Tiber by a young man from Vienna called Alexander Tschugguel.
I do not want to attack this gentleman but rather, try and understand what motivated this devout young Austrian to commit an act that has caused so much hurt to his own brothers and sisters in Christ.

The answer can perhaps be found in a recent interview in which Mr Tschugguel stated that he was simply upholding the First Commandment by removing a pagan idol.

Alexander Tschugguel, who wears traditional dress or ‘tracht’, went on to discuss a range of topics from the ‘globalist agenda’ to the Holy Roman Empire, to medieval castles with moats. He also considers Cardinal Brandmuller and Athanasius Schneider to be heroes, especially Archbishop Schneider whom he identifies as a 'Black Sea German'.

I sense that this is a man who deeply loves his German Catholic heritage. Yet, if the indigenous Amazonian carvings that he threw into the Tiber have nothing to do with Jesus, do any of his cultural traditions?

I say this as a fellow Catholic of German ancestry whose own parish was established by a German priest from Gelsenkirchen called Peter Hilgers who came here during Bismarck's Kulturkampf, or ‘culture struggle’ - a row between the Prussian government and the Catholic Church in the 1870s. 

We can manage to create discord between ourselves without national symbols to bring even more division among us.

So next month, when you see Wotan’s Yule springing up near the altar in your parish, spare a thought for our much maligned, indigenous faithful and their own cultural traditions. – and don’t dump the Christmas tree in the nearest river!



Image: The Day the Church of Scotland changed its position on nuclear weapons

22/11/2019

The Very Rev Dr Alan D McDonald reflects on the day the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland changed its position on nuclear weapons.  Weekly blog.


I understand that you want me to say a little about the 
position of the Church of Scotland on Nuclear Weapons. 
Well I know, because I was there when our position 
changed! Since 1978, as a young Minister, already 
passionate about Nuclear Disarmament, I had always tried 
to attend the General Assembly, on Church and Nation 
Day, whether as a Commissioner or just a person, sitting 
up in the public Gallery.

The highlight for me was the annual debate on Nuclear 
Weapons. And, in the end, the Debate always seemed to 
come down to two people. The famous George MacLeod of 
the Iona Community, and a Church Elder from Elie, in
Fife, Mr G N Warnock, who was a retired Army Colonel.
 
 Every year, George McLeod, a wonderful orator, made a 
compelling case about the evil of nuclear weapons. And year after year, the General Assembly politely 
listened, and then chose to vote for the deterrent 
argument, put forward by Colonel Warnock.
 
However, at what turned out to be one of MacLeod's last 
Assembly appearances, when he was ninety one, at the 
end of his passionate speech he put forward a motion 
which said: "As of now, the General Assembly declare that no Church 
can accede to the use of nuclear weapons to defend any 
cause whatever."

As Lord McLeod slowly made his way back to his seat, the Assembly could already see the ramrod figure of Colonel G 
N Warnock walking up to the podium. However, from the 
start of his speech the Commissioners were hearing 
something different.
 
He said that he had risen, not to 
oppose, but to support George MacLeod.

You could have 
heard a pin drop, as the retired Colonel, said that for him, 
everything had changed that year, 1986, and all because 
of Chernobyl. And he went on to say, that if he were still a serving soldier, and was ordered to press the nuclear 
button, he would not be prepared to do it, and would shoot himself first.
The Colonel returned to his seat as thunderous applause echoed around the old wooden rafters of the Kirk's 
Debating Chamber, and that day in 1986, Lord MacLeod's 
motion was carried by a huge majority.

And ever since 1986, that has remained the settled 
position of the General Assembly, of the Church of 
Scotland. That was why, in 2018 I was able to move the 
following Motion, which was adopted unanimously by the 
Assembly:

"The General Assembly:

• Reafirm the belief that 
possession, use, or threat of Nuclear Weapons is 
inherently evil;

• Congratulate the International Campaign 
to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, ICAN, on being awarded the 
Nobel Peace Prize 2018;

• Welcome the establishment of an 
International Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear 
Weapons,

• And urge the UK Government to engage with 
the Treaty process, as a way for the UK to disarm its 
nuclear weapons."



Page 33 of 89First   Previous   28  29  30  31  32  [33]  34  35  36  37  Next   Last