Blog

Image: The burning desire for justice

29/09/2017

Our latest blog is personal view by Marian Pallister (author & vice chair of Justice and Peace Scotland) as a recent event led her to reflect on our need for justice.


I’m not quite sure how is happened, but suddenly the talk and workshop I was presenting at Lismore’s Taproot Festival morphed into an intense Justice and Peace meeting. It was a privilege to experience depth of feeling that filled the room in the island’s heritage centre - heart of a literary and music celebration. People really do care about this world’s injustices.

The essence of my talk was the importance of giving a voice to the voiceless. Today we have the means to capture the lives of what I call ‘real’ people, and I’ve spent a lifetime attempting to do that – the witness of women in Croatia who saw their husbands and sons slaughtered before their eyes; the matrons in Romania blamed and belittled for the pitiful state of the country’s orphans, while the real responsibility lay with a dictator who denied the orphanages funding; the dead-eyed girls violated in Bosnia’s rape camps; the dying in Africa denied the drugs that kept alive HIV patients in the developed world.

More recently, I’ve written social histories, and the more research I do into the past, the more I understand the importance of those ‘real’ witnesses to the world’s events. But when there are no voices, there is no real memory of the work conditions, the hardships, the attitudes and prejudices. And then there can be no evidence on which to base change to achieve justice.

At the Lismore event, I had told the story of a four, or perhaps five times great grandfather of mine who drowned in a mining accident after a sudden flood in one of the coal seams. A newspaper report from the early 1800s gave the basic details , but what did his wife think when they brought home his belongings? Did they tell her that when they recovered the body a couple of weeks after the incident, the body was so rotted by the water that his feet came away in his shoes? Shoes – not boots. No steel toecaps.

I also read out the witness statements of men who gave evidence of a fatal accident at a lead mine in Strontian. This evidence moves me to tears, even though I have worked with it for several months as I got together my next book, which is a history of mining in Argyll. It moved others, too. The voice of a miner speaking across more that 160 years, telling us that the foreman laughed when he suggested he moved the rock that caused the fatality. That the danger of this unstable rock had been mentioned time and again. That the team was told to go ahead and blast a tunnel right in the path of the rock. The words of the dying man as he lay beneath the stone.

Health and safety gone mad? That phrase makes my blood boil – and clearly this rare voice of a man involved in such a situation (most of our history is told by those in charge, those who could write letters and reports and tell their own version of a situation to keep their own hands clean) sparked the passion for justice within the audience.

The Piper Alpha disaster, the Thalidomide tragedy, the injustices stirred by vocabulary that lead to crimes of hate against refugees and migrants – these and more came tumbling out. The Gaelic poet and academic Donald Meek sat to my right, the poet and novelist Norman Bissell was across the room, but it was the rest of the folk, the ‘real’ folk, whose voices rang out seeking justice in poetry and prose. 

Every injustice deserves to be voiced and to be heard. And the truth of the injustices can only really be told by those who experience them. It’s our job to listen – and put our faith into action to sort the situation.



Image: Down and Out in Glasgow

22/09/2017

This week's blog is written by Thomas Catterson, a volunteer at the Glasgow Night Shelter for destitute asylum seekers and refugees.  A very thought provoking read in which Tommy gives his personal insight into the daily struggles of those seeking sanctuary in our country.


Turning the corner from St Vincent street I see ahead of me the church where the Glasgow Night Shelter is based. It opens every evening, all year round, awaiting the resident asylum seekers. The weather today has been bright and breezy with a few heavy showers.The night shelter opens at 8pm and this evening there are a few asylum seekers standing outside smoking.

 

I arrive slightly later as I have been at a rendezvous point waiting on a named refugee who has been placed in the shelter from the Red Cross. The location of the Shelter is not allowed to be publicised and so asylum seeker referrals from other agencies have to be met at a pick up point in this case the Mitchell Library.

 

The people who are looked after at the Night Shelter are refused asylum seekers who are not eligible for support and are homeless, non-EU migrants who because of their immigration status cannot access normal homeless services. Other non-residents with temporary accommodation also arrive at meal time to share in the hot dinner and to check if any mail has arrived so it is very crowded at this time.


This group of people face multiple difficulties; often unable to speak English; without any family or friends who can help them; unable to do paid work; with an insecure immigration status; not knowing their rights and often scared to draw attention to their plight for fear of coming to the attention of the authorities, they are blocked from accessing any support that is funded by public money. Many no longer report to the Home Office because they are afraid of being detained and deported away from their family in the UK so they are wandering around Glasgow and other cities without any contact with the authorities.


On entering the community area of the church I see that two of the volunteers are making a hot meal for the residents in the kitchen and walking down a long dimly lit corridor I arrive at the tv room where there are six people sitting and moving about the room checking mail and eating donated food which has been placed on a trestle table. This room is very cramped with filing cabinets, donated male clothes stacked under the table, a couch, plates and cutlery stacked on shelves and a long fold up table on which the hot pots/trays of this evening's food are placed. Because of the shortage of space most of the asylum seekers eat standing up as there is no room for extra chairs. 


Many of the refused asylum seekers are so tired that they come in from the street and go straight to the hall and bed down for the night.  There are no shower facilities in this building only toilets. They sleep on the games hall floor on mattresses with no privacy and most sleep in the clothes they are wearing, probably rain wet and needing washed. They are mentally and physically exhausted by the extremely difficult circumstances of trying to exist on a day to day basis with no money and walking around Glasgow from 8am-8pm.

 

At 11pm lights are out in the sleeping area and the front door is locked. During the night some walk about unable to get to get to sleep and many have their sleep broken by people snoring or calling out in their disturbed sleep coupled with the  banging of the hall door as they exit and enter. Ear plugs are supplied.


Morning comes and all residents have be out of the church by 8am.

 

You can find out more about the work of the Glasgow Night Shelter at:

The Night Shelter web site  https://glasgownightshelter.org/

or http://www.scottishrefugeecouncil.org.uk/support_us

 

 



Image: A Different View

15/09/2017

Brian Quail has spent his adult life demonstrating against nuclear weapons and war.  As we approach 20th September and the ratification of the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty, Brian writes our latest blog and gives his personal views on the how Scotland should move forward to becoming nuclear free.

 


You see things differently when you are flat on your back under a nuclear convoy. Above I see the drive shaft, steering rods, the other various parts of the vehicle, beyond that the driver sits in his cabin, with the other 19 vehicles in the convoy all working together, the powers that control the death machine, governmental, departmental, political, the unseen high priests of Moloch and Mammon serving our Gods of Metal, the unimaginable power and might I am opposing - all seem quite different when viewed from the ground.
 
For a start the sheer absurdity of defying such power is overwhelming. But defy it I must. I do infinitesimally small things because that is all I can do. And no one ever made a bigger mistake than the person who doesn’t do anything because he can’t do everything.
 
So the police go through the regulation five stages before I am dragged out from under the vehicle, arrested and taken off to the cell in the police station. Precious time alone to pray and think.
 
Of all the thoughts that crowd into my brain, this above all: I would not be here if we had made the right decision in the referendum of 2014, because today Trident would not be here - or anywhere in Britain. The cosmic joke is that what the government of an independent Scotland would have to do, is, well, absolutely nothing at all. If the four subs stay tied up at Faslane they are not deployed, and if they are not deployed they can’t fire their missiles. They are, in effect, disarmed. The Scottish government then requests that the UK government remove its missiles. End of.
 
Since John Ainslie has shown in his masterly work “Trident - Nowhere To Go” there is no other place that Trident can operate from in the UK apart from the Faslane/Coulport complex, it follows that a nuclear free Scotland means a UK without Trident.
 
For me, the 2014 referendum was the Trident referendum. Either I voted for a Unionist party, all of which supported the continued deployment of Trident, or I voted for an independence party, all of which maintain a principled rejection of Trident. The referendum was about a moral issue of the utmost gravity.

All the Churches maintain an anti-Trident stance, so their position should have been clear. But was it?
 
Back at the start of the nuclear age, Albert Camus wrote “What the world expects of Christians is that Christians should speak out, loud and clear, and that they should voice their condemnation in such a way that never a doubt, never the slightest doubt, could rise in the heart of the simplest person. That they should get away from abstraction and confront the blood-stained face history has taken on today.”
 
That referendum was about much more than the governance of Scotland. It had a clear and unambiguous moral dimension, on which the churches had in fact already taken a firm stance. One side wanted a constitution banning nuclear weapons from Scottish land and waters, the other supported the present threat to use H Bombs.

I don’t think this was addressed from the pulpits. Churches can’t tell people how to vote, but I believe congregations should have been reminded that they had a clear choice between voting for the removal of nuclear WMD, and supporting their retention, and that the churches had in fact already condemned these.

Our job is to speak truth to power, not to try to be all things to all men. The collective failure of the churches to raise a prophetic voice on this occasion was in my opinion a failure to give Christian witness.

With a second referendum a real possibility, I can only hope and pray that this time the Church would speak out with a truly prophetic voice, so that there is no doubt of their rejection of Trident. Because for me Trident is the worst thing in the world, the machine for the extinction of all life. It is the undoing of Genesis.
 
Brian Quail
August 27, 2017



Page 71 of 89First   Previous   66  67  68  69  70  [71]  72  73  74  75  Next   Last