The term "illegal migrant" implies that a particular event in someone's life, such as irregularly crossing an international border or overstaying a visa, irrevocably taints that person's character as illegitimate or criminal. In fact, unauthorized migration is a civil, not a criminal offense, contrary to what news stories frequently imply.

The term "illegal" also reinforces prejudices about nationals of a particular country or persons of a particular race. It incorrectly suggests people crossing borders have no rights. That's simply not true: both domestic and international law provide specific protections and rights for migrants, including rights to due legal process, to seek asylum, and the right not to be arbitrarily detained.

For all these reasons we recommend the use of terms that more aptly capture the situation of these people, such as "undocumented immigrants" or "irregular migrants." On Friday, the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants issued a leaflet that included an alternative lexicon of more accurate and humanizing terms for migrants. The United Nations General Assembly, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR), the European Commission, the International Organization for Migration, and major media groups have already adopted or issued similar recommendations. As these groups have noted, use of the term "illegal" for migrants and other persons may be inaccurate and is most certainly dehumanizing.

By dropping the "illegal" tag, the venerable New York Times would not only bring its reporting in line with international practice - and its own guidelines - but would also reflect sensitivity for the difficult circumstances of migrants and to their dignity as human beings.

Human Rights Watch, 24/06/14